Regarding Eddy and Caltech

Starcetereus
6797
S11 Forfeit Champs
Posts
134
Location
United States of America
Joined
27 August 2015
1 March 2016 - 23:14 CET
#31
Kash says
The video is definitely weird, but the thing I try to keep in mind is that its very possible (And pretty likely) that when watching a video like this, the recorder has cherry picked the best scenes to make his/her point as strongly as possible. he/she is telling a story... these could be the most extreme cases of random twitching eddy did over 3 months... or it could all be from 1 day... if its from 1 day, then yeah, he is incredibly suspicious, if its over 3 months, those 4 - 5 scenes can't be trusted at face value, they could be anomalies.


If I remember correctly, CalTech noticed suspicious behavior one night on a pub while he was speccing him while respawning, and specced him in gathers the next day. The footage in his videos were taken over the course of a few hours.
aaa
lebra
4566
REFORMED
Posts
141
Location
no., Iceland
Joined
17 January 2013
1 March 2016 - 23:28 CET
#32
Golden says
I'm not sure why eddy is being forced to stream in order to play. I understand the suspicion towards him with regards to his aiming style, but none of those videos are proof of cheating. They're only red flags that show he should continue to be watched.

The difference between eddy and Eissfeldt with respect to this ruling is that eddy is only suspected of cheating, whereas Eiss ended up with a VAC ban, essential proving that he had installed cheats at some point - the situation that Caltech is in now.

To sum up my opinion of the situation:

eddy should be watched, yes, but the onus is on the admin team to provide referees to watch/record instead of forcing him to stream in order to play matches (and LOL forced to stream gathers). More power to eddy if he decides to stream in order to help 'clear his name'.

Caltech should be forced to stream in order to play matches due to having provided proof that he has installed cheats.


I know someone is going to say that I'm only siding with eddy because we're friends. We're not really. We played some gathers at the same time and I started picking him because he impressed me with some of his plays. I would defend anyone that was being wildly accused like this simply because it's happened to me before in other games.

you're making me login for this.

i'm questioning your experience if you think he's not suspicious, and you want the ns2 spectating system to be the decider.

humorous.
loMe
6335
Alski Syndrome
Posts
183
Location
United States of America
Joined
29 June 2014
1 March 2016 - 23:34 CET
#33
Golden says

I know someone is going to say that I'm only siding with eddy because we're friends. We're not really. We played some gathers at the same time and I started picking him because he impressed me with some of his plays.


lol I remember a couple weeks prior you were intentionally not picking Eddy cuz he would gorge, die, re-gorge, die, and re-gorge all game.

Golden says

I would defend anyone that was being wildly accused like this simply because it's happened to me before in other games.


In regards to being accused of cheating in other games (let's take CS 1.6 for example), every player was required to record demos in league play and you could be reported in every match. I remember playing Complexity in CAL-M when they were coming up and losing 14-16 to them. They told my team afterwards if we had beat them they would have requested all our demos -- and they would have been within their rights.

I haven't really been around much lately b/c of starting a new job so I wasn't heavily involved in determining the whole requiring them to stream thing, but it was my understanding that it wouldn't be a problem for them (performance-wise). Someone told me that eddy had recently upgraded his computer (with better specs than my own and I can stream fine) and I just assumed CalTech streaming wouldn't be an issue (since he basically said he wouldn't be playing much anyway). Obviously NS2 doesn't have a proper demo system, but I think it's fair to require someone we suspect of potential foul play (or red flags) to at least be required to record all official matches locally and upload to YouTube. It sucks, but CalTech releasing all those video (even tho Eddy already knew about the accusations) really fucked us over in handling this better. That being said, I think most people would be okay with local recordings if performance/internet is really such an issue for him.
ydy
2345
nazi hunter izO
Posts
28
Location
Somalia
Joined
18 November 2011
2 March 2016 - 01:49 CET
#34
Zeroing in on performance impact as many are doing overlooks what matters more than anything else: none of you has earned any right to see my IRL shit, to be privy to my text or voice chats, or to overburden me with your futile chores. The "punishment" of undeserved slander already exceeds the high crime of having high sens.

You can spectate me. You can request Shadowplay clips. You can horn your grubby little noses into whatever amount of streaming I end up doing on my own terms. That seems to me to afford you all the access you need without dangling threats or crawling much further up my ass than decorum demands. If this somehow turns out to be insufficient we can alter the plan down the line.

And again, folks, is there any way to keep this discussion private up to the point it ought to be? Frontpage-linked forum posts and wondering aloud just stir up shit and carry on the defamation torch of trolls-gone-by. Thanks!!
phone
2104
Snoofed
Posts
227
Location
Zimbabwe
Joined
29 March 2010
2 March 2016 - 02:25 CET
#35
glad we now have an official ENSL admin parading the witch hunt this time around.

eddy says
And again, folks, is there any way to keep this discussion private up to the point it ought to be? Frontpage-linked forum posts and wondering aloud just stir up shit and carry on the defamation torch of trolls-gone-by. Thanks!!


essentially this, and let's try to be respectful and uphold the concept of innocent until proven guilty.

the responses in this thread remind me of the juvenile 3 hours caltech's unsightly smear campaign went live 3 weeks ago. hopefully this thread meets the same fate as that one
ydy
2345
nazi hunter izO
Posts
28
Location
Somalia
Joined
18 November 2011
2 March 2016 - 03:37 CET
#36
Good news guys, after a huge fucking hassle I got streaming to (kind of) work!

The bad news is that it's causing significant input lag, the stream constantly stops to buffer, the quality is fucking awful, I fucking hate it, and it's totally gay!

http://www.twitch.tv/ydyns

Anyway come check me out!! To negotiate terms for a private cam show just hit me up ;)
Simba
2852
Posts
311
Location
United States of America
Joined
24 June 2012
2 March 2016 - 06:21 CET
#37
hint: when using urls in forums, wrap your link url in [ url ][ /url ]
Wob
Noavatar
B L I N K
Posts
296
Location
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Joined
18 January 2013
2 March 2016 - 13:18 CET
#38
Absurdon says
Wob says
Myx says
And I wish to publicly SHAME on everyone who justifies Eddy, when it turns out that this guy is really cheater.


Innocent until proven guilty please. This small community is all about reputation and cheating accusations are the most damaging.


can't see what u are talkin about. simple made it admin with ppl accusing him cheater over years.


He was proven guilty, good job.

Eddy is not proven guilty, so stop acting as if he is and just wait for proof.

If he was cheating and there is no proof and Eddy stops cheating and we never prove it, I don't care, that's one less cheater even if he still plays.

Eddy shouldn't have to stream his shit. He is innocent until proven guilty. The burden of proof is with you and is up to you to prove he is cheating, not for him to prove he is not.
joshhhy
4962
Barrel O' Monkey's
Posts
67
Location
Milwaukee, Earth
Joined
25 February 2013
2 March 2016 - 14:36 CET
#39
Can we just lock and bury this thread already. It's not productive whatsoever.

If someone does manage to get definitive proof that Eddy cheated, we can host a Roast of Simple: Eddy Edition when it happens. Until then, lets kill this thread.
Yaluzan
3786
Admin Abuse
Posts
174
Location
Netherlands
Joined
18 November 2012
2 March 2016 - 15:53 CET
#40
We have our own rules and own way of doing things, we aren't like a court where the "innocent until proven guilty" applies. If we are suspicious of someone we can discuss this and ask them to provide evidence of them playing fairly.
Back in season 1 to about.. 3(from what i remember) it was required to record demos(which existed back then), these demos had to be saved for an entire season and had to be ready to be uploaded in case it was requested.

These demos are no longer in NS2, What now then? People are suspicious of eddy. So we ask him to record him playing matches so we can check these for suspicious activity. This won't go on forever, but this will be discussed with eddy.

This thread was mostly made to get the word about because of people going "what about eddy and caltech?" "why are you not doing anything about it?" "blablabla"

This topic and future topics will be more heavily moderated. We do not intend to lock this topic.
Locklear
2866
one brit too many
Posts
111
Location
United States of America
Joined
24 July 2012
2 March 2016 - 17:43 CET
#41
Yaluzan says

These demos are no longer in NS2, What now then?


Just for the record, the demo system can still be used and I just recorded a demo myself. These demos are still in NS2. They still exist.

The issue is that it can be very inaccurate based on the machine that is doing the playback in comparison to the hardware of the original AFAIK.

If anyone would like to test this theory, I uploaded a demo myself just now. It also might have an entertainment factor to it.

Just place the file in your Username/AppData/Roaming/Natural Selection 2 Folder.

To Play just open console and type play filename

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-ecW0vdfimrcVhha2Q2dEdKblE/view?usp=sharing

In this case type play cheaterbanned

Give it a moment after this, it pauses for a short time before playing back input.

(As a final note, I think demos do break with each build but I'm not entirely sure)
Yaluzan
3786
Admin Abuse
Posts
174
Location
Netherlands
Joined
18 November 2012
2 March 2016 - 17:50 CET
#42
Locklear says


(As a final note, I think demos do break with each build but I'm not entirely sure)

I am 90% sure this is true. Guess we'll find out when UWE updates again and you try it out.
Simba
2852
Posts
311
Location
United States of America
Joined
24 June 2012
2 March 2016 - 17:55 CET
#43
Yaluzan has laid down the law on what will happen. He is correct that this is not the American judicial system where innocent until proven guilty applies. We cannot go back and retroactively undo everything the ensl tries to do.

Instead, let's make further discussion about changing the policy for the FUTURE haccusations.

I personally think if demos can be fixed/improved and workable, that is the best solution.
loMe
6335
Alski Syndrome
Posts
183
Location
United States of America
Joined
29 June 2014
2 March 2016 - 18:45 CET
#44
eddy says
Zeroing in on performance impact as many are doing overlooks what matters more than anything else: none of you has earned any right to see my IRL shit, to be privy to my text or voice chats, or to overburden me with your futile chores. The "punishment" of undeserved slander already exceeds the high crime of having high sens.

You can spectate me. You can request Shadowplay clips. You can horn your grubby little noses into whatever amount of streaming I end up doing on my own terms. That seems to me to afford you all the access you need without dangling threats or crawling much further up my ass than decorum demands. If this somehow turns out to be insufficient we can alter the plan down the line.

I'm sorry eddy but you don't get to dictate your own conditions to play in this league. CalTech blew up your spot but I can assure you we tried to keep this entire matter private. I personally pleaded with him for over an hour to not leak any of the videos but he refused to listen. Since it is out there, we have to address the public concerns, but the only person you can blame for this is CalTech, not the NSL.

But going back to whether we "earned the right" for your recording or not: We're not asking you, we're telling you. We're not saying you have to make these videos public for the rest of the community, but you will need to provide us with local recordings if you want to play in this league. The rest of the community, indeed, has no right to that stuff and they will have to accept our judgement on that matter. Until we can safely dismiss all suspicions or if demos become more reliable this is the fairest approach we have found.

You can take it or leave it. If you need any help with locally recording and compression I will gladly help you.
Cr4zy
6082
SpookerZ
Posts
195
Location
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Joined
29 January 2014
2 March 2016 - 19:16 CET
#45
loMe says
CalTech blew up your spot but I can assure you we tried to keep this entire matter private. I personally pleaded with him for over an hour to not leak any of the videos but he refused to listen. Since it is out there, we have to address the public concerns, but the only person you can blame for this is CalTech, not the NSL.


So CalTech went against the words of the admins, continues to harass eddy over cheating (if he is or isn't is not really relevant to this) and then installs cheats himself and somehow he gets away with the same "punishment".

All Eddy did was play and gets suspected. People suspected simple for a year+ and no one forced him to stream, people barely even spectated him, people probably wouldn't have banned him from videos alone.

Feels to me like CalTech should have been banned regardless if he continues to go against what the admins say.

Thankfully having to stream your matches or record isn't too harsh, if you run shadowplay anyway you're not going to lose much more if any performance if you record locally with shadowplay or streaming with it (other than the network impact)

As for lock's demo, wtf, 80mb for 30seconds of footage, IF THAT. Very long loading time for that alone. I can't tell if it's accurate, locklear would need to confirm that, even if it is im not sure it's worth the time, effort or file space it would consume.
Deck
Noavatar
Team Awesome
Posts
306
Location
United States of America
Joined
17 July 2014
2 March 2016 - 21:45 CET
#46
It looks like Caltech is showing himself out for the most part. So not sure if we have to focus on him, but yes I understand your point. Caltech was doing his own research to try to explain people's specific defenses of the eddy videos. Did he go too far and cross the line even if he made some good points? It looks like they already looked into that. Again, he isn't playing next season and seems to do a gather every once in awhile. Hopefully season 9 is clean. I know I just want to feel like everyone is on an even playing field, I think that is the goal here.
Decoy
Noavatar
Posts
73
Location
United States of America
Joined
6 October 2012
3 March 2016 - 00:02 CET
#47
Why are you "punishing" eddy is there's no proof he did anything? That's ridiculous. If there's suspicion, he should be watched. Even asked to provide demos. Announcing to the entire community that he's receiving punishment though? That makes him look awful. Do you really have enough players that you can afford to ostracize them? Not just eddy, but people who are close with him. Situations like this will leave a bad taste in people's mouths and resentment.

Wording is super important. You guys should have just said that you're asking him to provide recordings of his matches to ensure that he was legit, rather than phrasing it like he's already guilty / a cheater. If he were cheating, why wouldn't you ban him? And if there's not enough proof that he is cheating, you shouldn't be giving the impression that he is.

There is NOTHING in the rules about suspected cheaters. If you're going to pull something like this, it needs to be reflected in the rules: If the admins have enough reason to find you suspicious, they can privately request that you either A. stream your matches live to twitch or B. record locally and provide the recordings to the admins within 3 days of the match.

Additionally, if you guys are going with the "guilty til proven innocent" thing, then why aren't all players forced to stream their matches? What if I decide I think Simba is a filthy filthy cheater and I raise a big stink about it? Is he going to be forced to stream his matches? What's the process for deciding someone needs to record? Just when there's enough people complaining? After a referee watches him in a match? Referee and admin? All this shit should be hammered out in a clear format. Otherwise, it just looks like the admins are doing whatever they feel like. It shouldn't be up to one person, either (though I'm sure this situation was a group decision). If Yalu decides he really dislikes Wob, he can just be like YO wob fuck you, you gotta stream now or you can't play in the NSL. There should be a clear cut reason to request recordings and it should have to be signed off on by MULTIPLE people, at least 3-4.
Pelargir
5291
We're grumpy
Posts
452
Location
Lyon, France
Joined
6 April 2013
3 March 2016 - 01:00 CET
#48
Decoy says
Why are you "punishing" eddy is there's no proof he did anything? That's ridiculous. If there's suspicion, he should be watched. Even asked to provide demos. Announcing to the entire community that he's receiving punishment though? That makes him look awful. Do you really have enough players that you can afford to ostracize them? Not just eddy, but people who are close with him. Situations like this will leave a bad taste in people's mouths and resentment.

Wording is super important. You guys should have just said that you're asking him to provide recordings of his matches to ensure that he was legit, rather than phrasing it like he's already guilty / a cheater. If he were cheating, why wouldn't you ban him? And if there's not enough proof that he is cheating, you shouldn't be giving the impression that he is.

There is NOTHING in the rules about suspected cheaters. If you're going to pull something like this, it needs to be reflected in the rules: If the admins have enough reason to find you suspicious, they can privately request that you either A. stream your matches live to twitch or B. record locally and provide the recordings to the admins within 3 days of the match.

Additionally, if you guys are going with the "guilty til proven innocent" thing, then why aren't all players forced to stream their matches? What if I decide I think Simba is a filthy filthy cheater and I raise a big stink about it? Is he going to be forced to stream his matches? What's the process for deciding someone needs to record? Just when there's enough people complaining? After a referee watches him in a match? Referee and admin? All this shit should be hammered out in a clear format. Otherwise, it just looks like the admins are doing whatever they feel like. It shouldn't be up to one person, either (though I'm sure this situation was a group decision). If Yalu decides he really dislikes Wob, he can just be like YO wob fuck you, you gotta stream now or you can't play in the NSL. There should be a clear cut reason to request recordings and it should have to be signed off on by MULTIPLE people, at least 3-4.


Everyone knows Simba is way too bad to be a cheater.
“It's a dangerous business, Frodo, going out your door. You step onto the road, and if you don't keep your feet, there's no knowing where you might be swept off to.”
Simba
2852
Posts
311
Location
United States of America
Joined
24 June 2012
3 March 2016 - 01:23 CET
#49
Pelargir says
Decoy says
Why are you "punishing" eddy is there's no proof he did anything? That's ridiculous. If there's suspicion, he should be watched. Even asked to provide demos. Announcing to the entire community that he's receiving punishment though? That makes him look awful. Do you really have enough players that you can afford to ostracize them? Not just eddy, but people who are close with him. Situations like this will leave a bad taste in people's mouths and resentment.

Wording is super important. You guys should have just said that you're asking him to provide recordings of his matches to ensure that he was legit, rather than phrasing it like he's already guilty / a cheater. If he were cheating, why wouldn't you ban him? And if there's not enough proof that he is cheating, you shouldn't be giving the impression that he is.

There is NOTHING in the rules about suspected cheaters. If you're going to pull something like this, it needs to be reflected in the rules: If the admins have enough reason to find you suspicious, they can privately request that you either A. stream your matches live to twitch or B. record locally and provide the recordings to the admins within 3 days of the match.

Additionally, if you guys are going with the "guilty til proven innocent" thing, then why aren't all players forced to stream their matches? What if I decide I think Simba is a filthy filthy cheater and I raise a big stink about it? Is he going to be forced to stream his matches? What's the process for deciding someone needs to record? Just when there's enough people complaining? After a referee watches him in a match? Referee and admin? All this shit should be hammered out in a clear format. Otherwise, it just looks like the admins are doing whatever they feel like. It shouldn't be up to one person, either (though I'm sure this situation was a group decision). If Yalu decides he really dislikes Wob, he can just be like YO wob fuck you, you gotta stream now or you can't play in the NSL. There should be a clear cut reason to request recordings and it should have to be signed off on by MULTIPLE people, at least 3-4.


Everyone knows Simba is way too bad to be a cheater.


That's what I want them to think. No one can make the calls I make without wallhacks.
lebra
4566
REFORMED
Posts
141
Location
no., Iceland
Joined
17 January 2013
3 March 2016 - 02:15 CET
#50
I totally agree with you, let's rely on the garbage Natural Selection 2 spectating system to gather suitable proof when it comes to suspected cheaters just like we did with simple, regardless of how blatant he was at times it wasn't enough for sufficient evidence. The demo system currently in the game is unreliable and unstable, requesting local-recordings & streaming is the next step regardless of performance issues. Being forced to local-record or better stream is the next step regardless of the argument, claiming that to be a punishment is laughable.

We did ask CalTech not to make the accusations & videos public so we could deal with this in a more "secretive manner", both for the sake of those involved & to prevent this drama-fueled community from having a stroke. He published everything regardless which gave eddy a free pass & eliminated all hope of us dealing with it privately. Past complications where the staff has chosen to be more secretive than not usually ends up the same, where people complain about being kept in the dark & now vice versa.

TL;DR Everything was made public so we addressed the issue & declared our plans, all this fuss is more foolish than the CS:GO pro player bullying, laughable.
ydy
2345
nazi hunter izO
Posts
28
Location
Somalia
Joined
18 November 2011
3 March 2016 - 02:54 CET
#51
Lambo says
He published everything regardless which gave eddy a free pass
Free pass? That's completely backwards. http://www.ensl.org/topics/1646?page=1#post_21096
GORGEous
Noavatar
Posts
42
Location
United States of America
Joined
27 March 2012
3 March 2016 - 10:37 CET
#52
I watched the videos. At full speed, some of the clips are pretty suspicious. I have no idea why he is jittering so much when he tries to aim. If these videos were representative of eddy's typical game play, as opposed to cherry picked examples, then I'd think it would be prudent to continue monitoring him. At 0.25x speed, I was much less convinced. I saw a solid quarter second reaction time (normal), overaiming (normal) and firing off target and missing. I didn't see evilbot style obvious aimbotting, but you don't have to be blatant to be cheating. He could be cheating and it is obscured by a poor ns2 spectator system. He could be legit and is suspected because of a poor ns2 spectator system.

I, personally, am left unconvinced of cheating, but think there is enough to justify an investigation. I'm not sure that it is fair to eddy that he is punished when it has not been proven that he has done anything. If I were him, I would stream because that is the biggest F U to any false hack call.

P.S. I don't know eddy at all outside of friend of friends. No personal bias one way or another. I'm also not a human VAC, but I have seen a lot of really good shooters and a lot of aimbots. These videos didn't really look like either.
Simba
2852
Posts
311
Location
United States of America
Joined
24 June 2012
3 March 2016 - 17:51 CET
#53
Are these videos from 1st person spec? Jitter probably from imperfections of how that's programmed?
Locklear
2866
one brit too many
Posts
111
Location
United States of America
Joined
24 July 2012
3 March 2016 - 18:02 CET
#54
Simba says
Are these videos from 1st person spec? Jitter probably from imperfections of how that's programmed?


Yes but it doesn't explain the jitter going on. So it's not like everyone looks like this in spec.

@Lambro why so sarcasm and high and mighty tone.. everyone knows it is bad.
I wasn't seriously suggesting the demo system was the way to go but showing that it still works and could have potential if other options had too much performance loss for eddy.

From briefly reviewing other people's playbacks of my demo it seemed fairly accurate just a large file size abd broke after the new build.
Paskie
5945
Posts
69
Location
Finland
Joined
14 December 2013
3 March 2016 - 21:01 CET
#55
Yaluzan says
streaming and getting banned if he fails to stream a gather/match he plays


This punishment is absurd.

I don't think eddy, and definitely not caltech, should be punished like this.

Caltech was apparently using the hack only to prove a point and was therefore only trying to provide more evidence. If anyone thinks caltech is a person who would use hacks please let us know.

Eddys aim is naturally very different but doesn't really show any solid proof of cheats. This is just the way he aims. If he was cheating I'm sure more people would have "felt" it and more clearly like in simples case. I haven't spectated him very much and have overall very little experience on cheats but it doesn't seem like he would get any sudden aim boost for important engagements like a cheater would.



gg
Frozen
5408
Posts
80
Location
United States of America
Joined
24 April 2013
4 March 2016 - 04:29 CET
#56
Paskie says
Yaluzan says
streaming and getting banned if he fails to stream a gather/match he plays


This punishment is absurd.

I don't think eddy, and definitely not caltech, should be punished like this.

Caltech was apparently using the hack only to prove a point and was therefore only trying to provide more evidence. If anyone thinks caltech is a person who would use hacks please let us know.

Eddys aim is naturally very different but doesn't really show any solid proof of cheats. This is just the way he aims. If he was cheating I'm sure more people would have "felt" it and more clearly like in simples case. I haven't spectated him very much and have overall very little experience on cheats but it doesn't seem like he would get any sudden aim boost for important engagements like a cheater would.





Think everyone's very clear right now that caltech is the only one of the two confirmed to use cheats. People have already gone through using cheats to detect cheats and getting called cheaters.

You can't blame eddy for caltech not taking ns2 history in highschool
ryssk
Noavatar
Ram Ranch
Posts
319
Location
Sundsvall, Sweden
Joined
3 November 2012
4 March 2016 - 07:38 CET
#57
Frozen says
Paskie says
Yaluzan says
streaming and getting banned if he fails to stream a gather/match he plays


This punishment is absurd.

I don't think eddy, and definitely not caltech, should be punished like this.

Caltech was apparently using the hack only to prove a point and was therefore only trying to provide more evidence. If anyone thinks caltech is a person who would use hacks please let us know.

Eddys aim is naturally very different but doesn't really show any solid proof of cheats. This is just the way he aims. If he was cheating I'm sure more people would have "felt" it and more clearly like in simples case. I haven't spectated him very much and have overall very little experience on cheats but it doesn't seem like he would get any sudden aim boost for important engagements like a cheater would.





Think everyone's very clear right now that caltech is the only one of the two confirmed to use cheats. People have already gone through using cheats to detect cheats and getting called cheaters.

You can't blame eddy for caltech not taking ns2 history in highschool


Thank you for responding for the rest of us (everyone) here on ENSL, we are very obliged from your recent post. (im also speaking for the "everyone") *salt*
phone
2104
Snoofed
Posts
227
Location
Zimbabwe
Joined
29 March 2010
4 March 2016 - 17:17 CET
#58
kind of annoyed nobody actually brought this up but decoy brings up a lot of good points

Decoy says

Wording is super important. You guys should have just said that you're asking him to provide recordings of his matches to ensure that he was legit, rather than phrasing it like he's already guilty / a cheater. If he were cheating, why wouldn't you ban him? And if there's not enough proof that he is cheating, you shouldn't be giving the impression that he is.


the CRUX of this whole issue was wording, i get that english is 2nd language for a lot of admins and as someone who has rusty ass french and some high school spanish 4 i appreciate how much work it takes to develop mastery of another language. with this in mind PLEASE consider carefully in the future how you ask people who you are NOT SURE ARE GUILTY. also:

Yaluzan says
several failed attempts at contacting them resulted in the decisions to start it on wednesday

was there actual ANY ATTEMPTS at contact? eddy is a private guy but he knows that when youre adding him out of the blue on steam he should accept, especially when he's trying his best to clear his name of this fucking DUMBASS WITCH HUNT perpetuated by the ENSL community.


PaLaGi
2155
Posts
3
Location
United States of America
Joined
6 July 2010
6 March 2016 - 10:18 CET
#59
ydy says
The "punishment" of undeserved slander already exceeds the high crime of having high sens.


Has anyone asked eddy what his dpi/in game sens is, or cm/360? I play with an absurdly high sens (never met a comp player with higher) and I really wanna try to duplicate that ridiculous fucking jitter on targets. Pretty sure there is no way I will, but CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!!!
Myx
6585
Posts
22
Location
Russian Federation
Joined
9 January 2015
6 March 2016 - 10:32 CET
#60
He do not play with high sens, look his stream. His mice movements pretty slow and smooth, until he begins shooting.
New Reply