This happens but in my opinion 30% is WAY overstated. I could probably find a way to check this. Wanna bet money on this? What I learnt from economics is that people talk bullshit but when its their money on the line, the bullshit walks. And I don't see how marines would F4 more than aliens, on the contrary, it seems to be the opposite.
Hagagah, thought you'd say that! I believed it when I wrote it, tbf. Hence why I want you to bring out the stats from officials so we can compare them... see? :P
PS. No I don't wanna bet money on it! I wanna bet money on pcw vs aa, multivac that we agreed on. I draw or win vs aa/multivac's team when they have to never drop an rt and I can choose any 5 I want... fully able to drop rts. like they agreed, lol!
PPS. pissy piss pipaddy piss
PPPS. How could you find a way to check this? (Bet I could always think of a hypothetical that could question it! lol)
PPPPPPPPPS. Yeh I completely believe you about people, there's a sharp rationality increase by people who have something to lose. I think you meant to say 'far less' bullshit? That's what the link you posted explains anyway... Anyway, this is kinda obvious, adrenaline makes you way more focused, dopamine too... trust someone who abuses drugs! :P
BS. Why would it be the opposite though? If you're starting and the comm chair fucks up or you have an afk.. i'm sure that happens to marines way more! I'd say it was like exponentially in favour of the team that wins more being the team who f4 less, so 30% was imo a reasonable guess on assuming that aliens won like just under 60% of rounds. But that's largely due to the dynamics of a gather supporting an alien resource model for early game; late game is kinda different so you can't really put the types of balance 'side-by-side' without getting waaaay complicated! I'd rather just keep all 'times' of the round as level as possible.