Rate and FPS ceilings

pSyk
Noavatar
NewStyleD Return
Posts
41
Location
Germany
Joined
14 October 2006
26 June 2010 - 21:59 CEST
It's fine to care, but if you care you say it makes a difference, and that's the point of this discussion..
sublime
5
Posts
488
Location
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Joined
6 May 2005
27 June 2010 - 00:51 CEST
Listen fraggie, I've read the responses and they all boil down to either personal preference or the argument that having marines with higher DPS was somehow "intended" or their God given right. I pointed out that:

'Sublime'1. NS1 was not balanced at 200fps. The devs' "intended" comment is therefore irrelevant.


The only 2 relevant posts multi has made are that the difference between DPS between the slowest and the fastest ROFs is 2.5%. This is NOT insignificant though as that 2.5% is often the difference between life and death. He also posted about the acceleration being the only difference and I quite logically and thoroughly destroyed this argument as a reason to dismiss the debate:

'Sublime'2. As you say multi, you cannot outfly a skulk in a single direction whether you have 1fps or 200fps. The only way to avoid the skulk is to dodge and therefore acceleration is the only relevant attribute. Therefore someone with 200fps does have an advantage over someone with 125fps in this case.
NecRos_aka_Orgad
1526
Team Three
Posts
101
Location
Israel
Joined
7 October 2007
27 June 2010 - 02:08 CEST
wtf sublime? 2.5%?

set fps to 20.1. dps with w0 lmg is 100 (10 bullets per sec)

set fps to 111. dps is 185 (18.5 bullets for sec)

set fps to 200. dps is 200. from 111 that is almost 10% my friend, and is pretty much like an extra WU
aA
45
Posts
246
Location
Osaka, Japan
Joined
6 May 2005
27 June 2010 - 02:14 CEST
i bet he moves with the speed of light... so do bullets ; D also crt monitors are evil and so on and on... guys you either improve or not and keep dying no matter of what...
lump
81
Posts
499
Location
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Joined
7 May 2005
27 June 2010 - 04:14 CEST
'frG'[ME]125fps is more than playable and a good 90% of the community either play with 125fps or less anyway. I really don't see the problem.[/ME]

The same thing was said about 60fps, people were asking themself why they would ever need 100fps.

no it wasn't.. i ran a league at the time these debates happened... pretty sure i remember the agurmenets.. anyway.. the pro 100fps crew always had a leg to stand on, the 200fps crew barely have a straw to suck on.
lump
81
Posts
499
Location
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Joined
7 May 2005
27 June 2010 - 04:20 CEST
'aA'[ME]125fps is more than playable and a good 90% of the community either play with 125fps or less anyway. I really don't see the problem.[/ME]

i dont give a flying fuck about you sorry, it doesnt suit me and it's not playable for me. if you want to play 125 the you're free to do but fuck off from my 200 cause i ejnoy playing on it and i've said my reasons why and wont bother repeating again. dont force on me your stupid ideas cause i dont want to play on this crap 125 nor 100.


yes i know you're too much of a self righteous arrrogant fucker to consider trying to make the playing field more level.. sorry for trying to treat you like a decent human being.. i'll remember to treat you like a hypocritical arrogant newb who has no ethics and thinks himself as being superior without any fucking decent evidence. AKA.. a completely shit prick.. go fuck your little sister.
lump
81
Posts
499
Location
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Joined
7 May 2005
27 June 2010 - 04:45 CEST
'aA'[ME]125fps is more than playable and a good 90% of the community either play with 125fps or less anyway. I really don't see the problem.[/ME]

i dont give a flying fuck about you sorry, it doesnt suit me and it's not playable for me. if you want to play 125 the you're free to do but fuck off from my 200 cause i ejnoy playing on it and i've said my reasons why and wont bother repeating again. dont force on me your stupid ideas cause i dont want to play on this crap 125 nor 100.


of course your enjoy playing on 200fps.. that's because you get a boner from the severe advantage and my whole goddamn point.. can you dig yourself into a bigger hole of hypocrisy or do i have to spell out how much of a moron you're being even more than i am now? i'm sorry but if anyone can't see how much bullshit this aA and frG team are talking when trying to argue with the whole fucking EU ns community.. let me spell it out WITH A SLIGHT SUMMERY:
aA: i want 200fps because it plays better.
everyone else: NO SHIT FUCKNUTS. IT'S A STUPIDLY LARGE ADVANTAGE FOR JETPACKS AND LMG SO GROW A BALL SACK AND PLAY IN A REMOTELY SIMILAR SITUATION TO 90% OF THE COMMUNITY.
frG
15
TROLLS
Donors
Server Hoster
Posts
168
Location
Amsterdam, Virgin Islands (U.S.)
Joined
6 May 2005
27 June 2010 - 05:12 CEST
Wow control yourself dude.., if this isnt bannable then it would be time to remove the forum, no need to get personal like that.

It's fine if you cant agree on my/our points, i can understand that, but to call us out like that is utterly retarded.

Sub: i meant multi's last post, showing how fps impacts the actual stuff you see, as in tearing/buffering problems/bugs. Now i dont know ALL the details about this but this is probably what makes it smoother/better playable at 200 fps, at least for my 120hz TFT.

There is supposed to be a mousebug aswell when this problem occurs, negative acceleration or something, i didnt notice it, but Multi knows the ins and outs, so i am kinda hoping he can come out with some more details.



You guys do know that the LMG firerate is also different at 111fps, and i believe 70 fps ? (70 fps is the same firerate as 200 i thought, not sure), why has that NEVER been a problem EVER? we all played on either 111 fps or 125fps as alien, noone even bothered to say it could be too much.

Now with 200fps ALL the people that are whining cant actually reach 200fps because of hardware limits, is that really our fault ?





WHY DONT YOU GO AND FUCK OFF THEN?
U GO?
multi
Noavatar
The Team
Posts
37
Location
Germany
Joined
5 April 2008
27 June 2010 - 06:16 CEST
'aA'
200 fps is smooth and mouse movement doesnt feel like you're on xbox pad...
that's my opinion based on my experience.


'tomato'
if you can't adapt to 125fps when so many people play well on less than 100fps... you have issues.


'aA'
i suggest you to read my posts again since i dont rly think you've understood it.


look how politely aA response and he is right with his experience.

hl use the winmouse-cursor that's why we have basic windows mouse accelerate.in any frame hl fetch the cursor position and set the cursor in the middle of the screen. if we move the mouse too fast its hit the end of the screen and we lose 1:1 mouse ratio in ns.

with more fps its reset the cursor position oftener so we have faster possible mouse movement.

'Frg'
There are plenty of answers posted, not only by me. Read multivac's post very carefully.


'tomato'
125fps is more than playable and a good 90% of the community either play with 125fps or less anyway. I really don't see the problem.


'tomato'
i can't see ANY valid argument for preventing a fps cap of 125..


pls check my my post number 129. if u want i can try to explain it with some help lines.


jiriki
176
old people
Admins
Provider & Webmaster
Posts
490
Location
Oulu, Finland
Joined
1 May 2009
27 June 2010 - 11:51 CEST
frGNow with 200fps ALL the people that are whining cant actually reach 200fps because of hardware limits, is that really our fault ?

Personally I don't have a big problem with the fact 200FPS gives better LMG DPS. And I don't have a big problem with the fact not everyone can reach it, although I think it is still a valid concern. The real question is that if everyone could run 200FPS Jetpack/HMG, would such games be fun and balanced? For that question, there are valid arguments both sides.
Get to the spaceship!
lump
81
Posts
499
Location
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Joined
7 May 2005
27 June 2010 - 12:53 CEST
'frG'
It's fine if you cant agree on my/our points, i can understand that, but to call us out like that is utterly retarded.


I didn't start the personal crap so don't even go there sista!

'multi'look how politely aA response and he is right with his experience.

to say I don't understand is not very polite imo.. maybe you should both try to understand the word that i used: 'adapt'. I chose this word for a reason, it would be nice if people could actually read my posts instead of attempting to be superior.


'multi'pls check my my post number 129. if u want i can try to explain it with some help lines.

lol, you posted an image which shows clearly that tearing exists on both 60fps and 200fps... big deal? kind of supports the idea that there isn't much of a difference between the two in terms of smoothness. Maybe you could try to make it relevant and post pics of the fps we're suggesting :P

anyway, i know what point you're trying to make but i really don't see how issues like the ones being brought up by the 'for 200fps' people really compare to large game imbalances that the 'for 125fps' people are bringing up. o_O

'frG'200fps ALL the people that are whining cant actually reach 200fps because of hardware limits, is that really our fault ?

lol frG, you're really not very good at the facts thing are you :P

I know two people who can achieve and have played on 200fps but think it should be capped... i'm one of them.. *rolleyes*
mu
18
Posts
75
Location
Edinburgh, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Joined
6 May 2005
27 June 2010 - 13:04 CEST
fuck ns why do i even still visit ensl.org
multi
Noavatar
The Team
Posts
37
Location
Germany
Joined
5 April 2008
27 June 2010 - 13:33 CEST
tomato did u notice thats fucking mousebug exist?
why should we adapt to a fucking speed cap on mouse movements?

and u dont get the point form my screenshot!

its hard to make it visible that's why i used 60 and 200fps.

atman
878
Posts
57
Location
Luleå, Denmark
Joined
7 March 2006
27 June 2010 - 13:34 CEST
you love it mu
multi
Noavatar
The Team
Posts
37
Location
Germany
Joined
5 April 2008
27 June 2010 - 13:41 CEST
less fps increase the diameter of the black circle

http://b038.blue.fastwebserver.de/tear2.png
lump
81
Posts
499
Location
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Joined
7 May 2005
27 June 2010 - 14:03 CEST
'multivac'why should we adapt to a fucking speed cap on mouse movements?

1. everyone else can. stop whining.
2. the alternative is a large imbalance.
multi
Noavatar
The Team
Posts
37
Location
Germany
Joined
5 April 2008
27 June 2010 - 14:04 CEST
'tomato'
i really don't see how issues like the ones being brought up by the 'for 200fps' people


so you agree issues exist?
aA
45
Posts
246
Location
Osaka, Japan
Joined
6 May 2005
27 June 2010 - 14:10 CEST
'tomato'[quote='aA'][ME]125fps is more than playable and a good 90% of the community either play with 125fps or less anyway. I really don't see the problem.[/ME]

i dont give a flying fuck about you sorry, it doesnt suit me and it's not playable for me. if you want to play 125 the you're free to do but fuck off from my 200 cause i ejnoy playing on it and i've said my reasons why and wont bother repeating again. dont force on me your stupid ideas cause i dont want to play on this crap 125 nor 100.


of course your enjoy playing on 200fps.. that's because you get a boner from the severe advantage and my whole goddamn point.. can you dig yourself into a bigger hole of hypocrisy or do i have to spell out how much of a moron you're being even more than i am now? i'm sorry but if anyone can't see how much bullshit this aA and frG team are talking when trying to argue with the whole fucking EU ns community.. let me spell it out WITH A SLIGHT SUMMERY:
aA: i want 200fps because it plays better.
everyone else: NO SHIT FUCKNUTS. IT'S A STUPIDLY LARGE ADVANTAGE FOR JETPACKS AND LMG SO GROW A BALL SACK AND PLAY IN A REMOTELY SIMILAR SITUATION TO 90% OF THE COMMUNITY.[/quote]

that's all your intepratation, sorry man you've lost your face completly after one post and i dunno if some1 will take you any serious by now.
lump
81
Posts
499
Location
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Joined
7 May 2005
27 June 2010 - 14:12 CEST
multi, i agree that people have preferences which can be issues on a personal level and i fully agree that aA has issues. but tbh i haven't noticed any real mousebug while i play on 125, 100, 200 or whatever fps.. sure the game smoothness will drop a little with a lower fps and the black circle gets a bit bigger.. but those things are nothing compared to a large game imbalance
aA
45
Posts
246
Location
Osaka, Japan
Joined
6 May 2005
27 June 2010 - 14:17 CEST
'tomato'[quote='frG']
It's fine if you cant agree on my/our points, i can understand that, but to call us out like that is utterly retarded.


I didn't start the personal crap so don't even go there sista!

'multi'look how politely aA response and he is right with his experience.

to say I don't understand is not very polite imo.. maybe you should both try to understand the word that i used: 'adapt'. I chose this word for a reason, it would be nice if people could actually read my posts instead of attempting to be superior.


[/quote]

wow look here we have someone sensitive over here... someone who just throw tons of flames himself... seriously be mature adquacy to your age or dont start disscusion with matured ppl if you can't handle the words and go berserk.
and sorry i wont adapt to you so you can be pleased. i have my style.
multi
Noavatar
The Team
Posts
37
Location
Germany
Joined
5 April 2008
27 June 2010 - 14:42 CEST
so how can u say which kind of issues are tolerable?
if your perception is not good enough to feel the issues?

i dont wanna insult you but your game sense is not high enough to say the game is imbalance. in the last gather you were not able to drop one dc in time. and u never play in any top team.


lump
81
Posts
499
Location
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Joined
7 May 2005
27 June 2010 - 14:49 CEST
you're telling me that an issue that only a select few can perceive is less tolerable than an issue that everyone can spot a mile away? really? you're really trying to make a point like that? wow.

my game sense is not high enough to say the game is imbalanced? lol.. i've done more than you have to get the game to state of balance it's in now. So don't even try that one ;)

Lol, you're now saying that i can't comment because i don't have a button bound for dropping dcs? Seems like you're really grasping onto anything you can to make an argument now. Let's all comment on single rounds. *rolleyes*
lump
81
Posts
499
Location
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Joined
7 May 2005
27 June 2010 - 14:50 CEST
and leave my previous clans out of this talk please, they were all full of players far better than you'll ever be. You know nothing about my experiences with NS.
multi
Noavatar
The Team
Posts
37
Location
Germany
Joined
5 April 2008
27 June 2010 - 15:25 CEST
tomato its over now u just lost!

so u run out of arguments and just start with insults and "red flag" logic like

'tomato'
you're telling me that an issue that only a select few can perceive is less tolerable than an issue that everyone can spot a mile away?


we should comment
'tomato'
i don't fade because i know i suck at it


but we need fades to counter jetpacks.
so how can u say 200fpsjps are imba if u cant fade.

so u should listen to good fades like me and aA!


'tomato'
and leave my previous clans out of this talk please, they were all full of players far better than you'll ever be. You know nothing about my experiences with NS.

1. 5 years div2
2. 1.5 kdr ablens
3. always last pick in gathers
pSyk
Noavatar
NewStyleD Return
Posts
41
Location
Germany
Joined
14 October 2006
27 June 2010 - 15:32 CEST
lol
pSyk
Noavatar
NewStyleD Return
Posts
41
Location
Germany
Joined
14 October 2006
27 June 2010 - 15:33 CEST
What about tweadle, who restarted this discussion in the first place??
lump
81
Posts
499
Location
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Joined
7 May 2005
27 June 2010 - 16:01 CEST
lol.. what are you talking about. of course i can say the jp are imba.

i can say they are imba because i've played with 200fps jp and 125fps jp.. quite easy to say they're imba.. i've also faded against 200fps jp and 125fps jp.. yep.. pretty sure it's easy to say they're imba, don't have to be the best fade around to see that. And actually i used to main fade for my clan so i wasn't always bad. I just am now and i don't deny it.

red flag logic? you're still trying to support your idea that a small bug noticed by only a few is more significant than an imbalance noticed by most people?.. i'm not using red flag logic, i'm trying to figure out if your argument can come close to any definition of logic.. it's redonkeylous.. like trying to say 1 is bigger than 50.

1 2 3? lol..
1. my first seasons in the ENSL were in the prem while semi active. who cares what div i'm in now?
2. i don't stack able like you nobs, usually i'm going alien and being stacked against but still coming out with a ratio when i spend half the time eating res.
3. wrong.
4. most of my time with NS has been working for game balance and doing stuff for the community.. sorry if my skill level isn't high enough for you to consider my argument but maybe you should take your cock out your ass?
Tane
91
HasBeens & NeverWas
Posts
57
Location
Jyväskylä, Finland
Joined
7 May 2005
27 June 2010 - 16:04 CEST
Basic value in every kind of leagues is that every participator should have equal rights to win it. Only skill should be relevant. This is the reason why progamers play in LAN with same kind of computers, configs and so on. This is/should be value of ENSL too. Of course we can't ever reach total equality but we should be as equal as possible. I think everybody agrees this idea, right?

This is how I have seen "argumentation" at this point.

Standpoint: 200 FPS gives advantage and therefore should be listed as an exploit.

There are two main counter arguments:
1. No, 200 FPS doesn't give advantage.
- Denying the standpoint is always risky. There is evidence that 200 FPS indeed gives higher ROF for LMG, it also gives jetpacks better mobility and makes game smoother. Yes, smoothness is also an advantage. If someone still wants to hold on this argument, he/she should null and void the current evidence. There is also logical argument against this argument: "If 200 FPS doesn't give advantage, why use it?"

2. Yes, it gives advantage but those who can reach 200 FPS have rights to this advantage.
- First, I like to say that this argument contradicts the idea of equality which I mentioned above. So if somebody still wants to hold on this argument, he has to explain why someone should have advantage over others. There has been some arguments that have try to do this, but for my eyes all of those have been fallacies.

To be honest I don't expect that any of you to chance your point of view. I don't even understand why I am writing this. Those who choose to live in ignorance will do it in future as well.

sublime
5
Posts
488
Location
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Joined
6 May 2005
27 June 2010 - 17:54 CEST
So surely you can just fix the mouse sensitivity issue by lowering your windows sensitivity Multi?


Also as I've said before, I move the screen around more than anyone and I can handle 125fps. Basically if you can't handle it you need to buy a better monitor. Holy shit look what just happened! Isn't it irritating when people tell you to buy better hardware!


Finally, can we please ban aA from this debate. All his replies serve to do is infuriate since they take FOREVER to read and rarely - if ever - contain a logical argument. Usually it's just condescension with no substance whatsoever.
aA
45
Posts
246
Location
Osaka, Japan
Joined
6 May 2005
27 June 2010 - 18:14 CEST
'tomato'and leave my previous clans out of this talk please, they were all full of players far better than you'll ever be. You know nothing about my experiences with NS.


they all ended as quickly as they've been formed...


'tomato'lol.. what are you talking about. of course i can say the jp are imba.

i can say they are imba because i've played with 200fps jp and 125fps jp.. quite easy to say they're imba.. i've also faded against 200fps jp and 125fps jp.. yep.. pretty sure it's easy to say they're imba, don't have to be the best fade around to see that. And actually i used to main fade for my clan so i wasn't always bad. I just am now and i don't deny it.


'tomato'
i don't fade because i know i suck at it

then i know why you call em imba. if you come with your fade towards me it's quite "logic" that you will die.

no sorry lump i dont remember a time when you were either good comm or good field player
New Reply